<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best Photoshop Mistakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weirdnewsfiles.com/weird-photos/weird-photoshop/best-bad-photoshop-mistakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weirdnewsfiles.com/weird-photos/weird-photoshop/best-bad-photoshop-mistakes/</link>
	<description>Weird News, Weird Photos, Weird Video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:12:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kuhu</title>
		<link>http://weirdnewsfiles.com/weird-photos/weird-photoshop/best-bad-photoshop-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weirdnewsfiles.com/?p=778#comment-980</guid>
		<description>awfully hilarious i must say...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awfully hilarious i must say&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sewart</title>
		<link>http://weirdnewsfiles.com/weird-photos/weird-photoshop/best-bad-photoshop-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Sewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weirdnewsfiles.com/?p=778#comment-956</guid>
		<description>As a j-school photojournalism graduate, for me the most unethical is the Tiger Woods image. The Washington Post should fire whoever did it. The caption clearly states the image is an actual moment of the two men together watching the same ball, and the positioning of the subjects makes that obviously impossible. Reminds me more of an M.C. Escher work ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a j-school photojournalism graduate, for me the most unethical is the Tiger Woods image. The Washington Post should fire whoever did it. The caption clearly states the image is an actual moment of the two men together watching the same ball, and the positioning of the subjects makes that obviously impossible. Reminds me more of an M.C. Escher work &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isla</title>
		<link>http://weirdnewsfiles.com/weird-photos/weird-photoshop/best-bad-photoshop-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>Isla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 03:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weirdnewsfiles.com/?p=778#comment-949</guid>
		<description>You can still see the leg of the guy in the back who was steering the boat in the photo shopped picture with Prince Charles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can still see the leg of the guy in the back who was steering the boat in the photo shopped picture with Prince Charles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birdfarm</title>
		<link>http://weirdnewsfiles.com/weird-photos/weird-photoshop/best-bad-photoshop-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>birdfarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weirdnewsfiles.com/?p=778#comment-947</guid>
		<description>in the &quot;ethnic cleansing&quot; one, it looks like the guy was taken out because they wanted to put a line of text where his head is. they just didn&#039;t have as much vertical space for the photo in the Sun as they did in the Metro. 

of course, i also have a sense of humor - &quot;ethnic cleansing&quot; is an excellent caption. just saying - i think that&#039;s the reason he was removed. if you look at the water where he was, you can see some classic &quot;terrible cloning tool&quot; action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in the &#8220;ethnic cleansing&#8221; one, it looks like the guy was taken out because they wanted to put a line of text where his head is. they just didn&#8217;t have as much vertical space for the photo in the Sun as they did in the Metro. </p>
<p>of course, i also have a sense of humor &#8211; &#8220;ethnic cleansing&#8221; is an excellent caption. just saying &#8211; i think that&#8217;s the reason he was removed. if you look at the water where he was, you can see some classic &#8220;terrible cloning tool&#8221; action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lux lux</title>
		<link>http://weirdnewsfiles.com/weird-photos/weird-photoshop/best-bad-photoshop-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>lux lux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 03:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weirdnewsfiles.com/?p=778#comment-879</guid>
		<description>that oversized hand lady is haunting my dreams, reaching out with her terrifying fingers.. eek how could any editor, no matter how crappy and low-rent the catalogue, actually think that picture was ok? 
blind people shouldnt work in photoshop..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that oversized hand lady is haunting my dreams, reaching out with her terrifying fingers.. eek how could any editor, no matter how crappy and low-rent the catalogue, actually think that picture was ok?<br />
blind people shouldnt work in photoshop..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tevis</title>
		<link>http://weirdnewsfiles.com/weird-photos/weird-photoshop/best-bad-photoshop-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>Tevis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 05:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weirdnewsfiles.com/?p=778#comment-874</guid>
		<description>um, to &#039;markster&#039;

these have OBVIOUSLY been photoshopped because
quite OBVIOUSLY stated at the top was
&quot;Best Photoshop Mistakes&quot;


context clues, friend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um, to &#8216;markster&#8217;</p>
<p>these have OBVIOUSLY been photoshopped because<br />
quite OBVIOUSLY stated at the top was<br />
&#8220;Best Photoshop Mistakes&#8221;</p>
<p>context clues, friend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markster</title>
		<link>http://weirdnewsfiles.com/weird-photos/weird-photoshop/best-bad-photoshop-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-853</link>
		<dc:creator>markster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weirdnewsfiles.com/?p=778#comment-853</guid>
		<description>These photos have clearly been photoshopped...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These photos have clearly been photoshopped&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://weirdnewsfiles.com/weird-photos/weird-photoshop/best-bad-photoshop-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weirdnewsfiles.com/?p=778#comment-687</guid>
		<description>Took me 30 seconds to fix this using Corel Paint Shop Pro X.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Took me 30 seconds to fix this using Corel Paint Shop Pro X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gk</title>
		<link>http://weirdnewsfiles.com/weird-photos/weird-photoshop/best-bad-photoshop-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>gk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weirdnewsfiles.com/?p=778#comment-512</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Sun, a British tabloid practices some ethnic cleansing. The same photo appeared in the Metro with the extra, necessary guy, driving the boat.&quot;

And why do believe this was done as a practice of &quot;ethnic cleansing&quot;? Proof?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Sun, a British tabloid practices some ethnic cleansing. The same photo appeared in the Metro with the extra, necessary guy, driving the boat.&#8221;</p>
<p>And why do believe this was done as a practice of &#8220;ethnic cleansing&#8221;? Proof?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://weirdnewsfiles.com/weird-photos/weird-photoshop/best-bad-photoshop-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weirdnewsfiles.com/?p=778#comment-496</guid>
		<description>That last one is the best. I agree. I do love the alien eyes and the freakishly large hand though. But, lady penis trumps any other body part. It&#039;s ...It&#039;s just science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last one is the best. I agree. I do love the alien eyes and the freakishly large hand though. But, lady penis trumps any other body part. It&#8217;s &#8230;It&#8217;s just science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
